Jerusalem (Jehoash) Tablet From the Tribe of Benjamin 840 BCE
Moabite Stele and this tablet have the same letter style and their stone even looks similar. For translation methodology see: How to Translate Alphabetic Akkadian Texts
Moabite Stele and this tablet have the same letter style and their stone even looks similar. For translation methodology see: How to Translate Alphabetic Akkadian Texts
(May 15, 2023) This text is blaming a drought on the astrological powers of fate. These powers of the full moon god Su are discipling humans for some unstated reason.
(May 3, 2023) Droughts separate the archaeological periods in the Levant. States weakened by local droughts were often subject to raids right after the droughts by Mesopotamian empires which were unaffected due to their irrigation. Below is the latest widely accepted chronology proposed by Amihai Mazar in 2014 shown below:
This tablet was found in the Muslim cemetery outside the eastern wall of the Old City of Jerusalem, right next to the Temple Mount. The unknown finder passed it on to an antiquities dealer Hasan Akilan in 1999 who then placed it with antiquities dealer Oded Golan to fence it. In 2003 the tablet was noticed by the Israeli Antiquities Authority who in 2004 charged Golan with fraud leading to a trial on the tablet’s authenticity. Forgery could not be proved. Instead, the tablet was shown by physical tests to date to at least as far back as 200 BCE when it was caught up in a major fire with nearby golden objects. Microscopic gold droplets were found on its surface.
The prevailing assumption of those who believe the tablet is authentic is that this tablet was burned along with other Jerusalem temple artifacts when the temple was Hellenized by king Antiochus IV Epiphanes when he ruled the Near East between 175 and 164 BCE. The burned remains were then dumped off the mount onto land which would later become a cemetery. This may very well be the case but the tablet's letter style is similar to that of the Moabite Stele indicating it dates to around the time of the 840 BCE Elijah drought. This tablet was likely found when Jerusalem was being rebuilt and placed in the temple store room for safekeeping.
This so-called Jehoash tablet was thought to be a fraud by many because it could not be translated from Hebrew and because it was tainted by association with other forged antiquities found in the possession of antiquities dealer Oden Golan.
In 2004, Oded Golan was indicted on several charges by the Israeli government at the behest of the Israel Antiquities Authority who sought to prove mainly that the text on the James ossuary was forged. The Jerusalem tablet text was included in the trial for completeness. After eight long years on March 2012 this case finally ended with Oded’s acquittal because neither text could be proven as forged using physical tests (Matti 2012). For some, the physical tests on the Jerusalem tablet indicated the text was old and genuine (Rosenfeld, and all 2008) yet others claimed such physical phenomena could be reproduced by very skilled forgers yet this was before the dating evidence came in (Silberman and Goren 2003).
Reporter Matthew Kalman summed up the trial in the Israeli newspaper Haaratz on May 21, 2014. Some excerpts from his article are below:
In early 2003 Frank Cross presented a Hebrew translation (see image on left) yet later in the year admitted that his translation was flawed agreeing with others that the text was a forgery stating:
This allowed all Hebrew linguists to claim at the start of the trial that the tablet was a fraud. This was reported by Silberman and Goren's (2003) pro-forgery paper which said:
Yet after the trial could not prove that it was forged, Cohen then thought it could be translated from Hebrew (Cohen 2007). Yet this has never been demonstrated without the translator resorting to translation fraud.
Despite being a Judahite text this /s/ sounds are not yet reversed at this early date.
Being a Judahite text the /s/ sounds of Š and Ṣ are reversed from normal.